Editor's Note: The following "fact sheet" (published in October 2005) was prepared by the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA), United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Justice’s Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative. This fact sheet is significant for what it advocates--an analytical component to accompany the myriad of tasks encountered by law enforcement agencies--and the implications for those of us who work in the defense bar, were such analysis done in a regular and standard manner.
Following are listed the advantages that might be expected from such an analytical function:
1. Helps solve criminal investigations.
The analytical function develops a variety of intelligence
products to assist investigators in detecting, preventing,
and responding to criminal and terrorism activities.
Analytical personnel initiate inquiries, conduct information
searches, and act as a central point for information
gathered.
2. Increases the ability to prosecute
criminals.
Personnel assigned to the analytical function develop
summary tables, charts, maps, and other graphics for use
in a grand jury or trial. Analysts provide factual and expert
testimony and organize evidence for presentation in court.
3. Supports the chief executive and the
agency’s mission.
By maximizing the analytical function, the chief executive
can obtain important information and intelligence to
possibly prevent future criminal activities. Personnel
can prepare materials to assist in allocating resources;
developing budget and resource requests; and preparing
departmental reports, investigative briefings, and press
releases.
4. Proactively informs law enforcement
officers of crime trends and develops
threat, vulnerability, and risk
assessments.
The analytical function provides support to tactical and strategic operations. Personnel analyze crime
reports, identify crime hot spots, develop crime bulletins and summaries, study serial crime data, and forecast
future crime. The analytical function develops proactive intelligence products that assess the potential threats
of crime groups or criminal activities and recommends methods to intervene in these threats.
Analysis is an integral part of every major investigation an agency opens. Often, small pieces of information that may appear
insignificant can be a major part of a larger picture. The analytical function organizes these critical pieces of data and creates
valuable and meaningful products to assist law enforcement in solving cases and prosecuting criminals. Personnel responsible for producing intelligence are professionals, civilian or sworn, whose training includes law enforcement analytical techniques and criminal analysis. The analytical function benefits law enforcement agencies in the following ways.
5. Trains law enforcement and other
intelligence personnel.
Staff develop course modules on intelligence and analytic
methods and provide awareness and methodology training
to agency members, executives, and managers.
6. Assists in the development of
computerized databases to organize
information and intelligence.
Personnel within the analytical function help in the
development and maintenance of systems that collect,
collate, retrieve, and disseminate information. Analytical
staff participate in departmental testing and acquisition of
investigative, intelligence, and analytical software.
7. Fosters meaningful relationships with
other law enforcement personnel.
Analytical staff interact with other law enforcement
agencies and build relationships with peers, allowing
them to quickly obtain information and efficiently assist
in multijurisdictional or complex cases. Through contact
with national programs and professional associations,
personnel are able to ascertain national issues that may
affect local agencies.
8. Ensures compliance with local, state,
tribal, and federal laws and regulations.
Analytical personnel provide expertise and knowledge in
the development of protocols to ensure compliance with
local, state, tribal, and federal laws and rules that govern
intelligence sharing, privacy, and civil liberties.
9. Provides support to fusion centers.
Personnel provide support to local, state, or regional
fusion centers by performing intelligence services such
as crime-pattern, association, telephone-toll, and financial
analysis. They create intelligence reports, briefs, threat
assessments, and other intelligence products to aid in the
prevention and deterrence of crime, including terrorism.
Accurate, timely, and relevant analysis is a critical component in crime prevention and crime-fighting efforts.
My Blog List
Showing posts with label law enforcement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label law enforcement. Show all posts
Friday, November 21, 2008
Fact Sheet The 2006 National Youth Gang Survey
U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
Editor's Note: The Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency and Prevention (OJJDP) published, on August 1, 2008, a comprehensive National Youth Gang Survey and a Fact Sheet, below, which serves as a highly condensed brief. For additional information about youth gangs, call OJJDP’s Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse at 800–851–3420, or contact NYGC at 800–446–0912 or http://www.iir.com/nygc/. Arlen Egley, Jr., Ph.D., is a Senior Research Associate and Christina E. O’Donnell, M.S., is a Research Associate with NYGC, which is operated for OJJDP by the Institute for Intergovernmental Research in Tallahassee, FL. The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention is a compo nent of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Assistance; the Bureau of Justice Statistics; the Community Capacity Development Office; the National Institute of Justice; the Office for Victims of Crime; and the Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking (SMART).
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
J. Robert Flores, Administrator July 2008 #05
Highlights of the
2006 National Youth Gang Survey
by Arlen Egley, Jr., and Christina E. O’Donnell
Annually since 1995, the National Youth Gang Center (NYGC) has conducted the National Youth Gang Survey (NYGS) of law
enforcement agencies across the United States regarding the pres ence and characteristics of local gang problems. This Fact Sheet summarizes NYGS findings from the 2006 survey. The current nationally representative sample was selected in 2002 and
includes the following agencies:
◆ All police departments that serve cities with populations of
50,000 or more (n=624) (larger cities).
◆ All suburban county police and sheriffs’ departments (n=740)
(suburban counties).
◆ A randomly selected sample of police departments that serve
cities with populations between 2,500 and 49,999 (n=695)
(smaller cities).
◆ A randomly selected sample of rural county police and
sheriffs’ departments (n=492) (rural counties).
NYGC asked survey recipients to report information solely for
youth gangs, defined as “a group of youths or young adults in
your jurisdiction that you or other responsible persons in your
agency or community are willing to identify as a ‘gang.’”
Motorcycle gangs, hate or ideology groups, prison gangs, and
exclusively adult gangs were excluded from the survey.
Survey Findings
Of the 2,551 survey recipients, 2,199 (86 percent) responded to the 2006 survey. Table 1 shows the percentage of agencies that reported gang problems by area type. Overall, it is estimated that 3,400 jurisdictions served by city (population of 2,500 or more) and county law enforcement agencies experienced gang problems in 2006. Based on survey results, it is estimated that approximately 785,000 gang members and 26,500 gangs were active in the United States in 2006. Readily available and reliable gang-crime data are difficult to obtain on a national level. Previous NYGC surveys reveal that agencies with gang problems often do not regularly record local offenses, with the exception of homicides, as “gang-related.” With these data limitations in mind, the 2006 NYGS requested each respondent to provide both specific gang-homicide data (i.e., number of homicides involving a gang member as either the perpetrator and/or the victim) and general trends (i.e., increasing, decreasing) for other serious gang-related crimes in the respondent’s jurisdiction. Among agencies reporting gang problems in smaller cities and rural counties, a large majority (89 and 86 percent respectively) recorded zero gang-related homicides in 2006. By comparison, most cities with populations over 100,000 experienced one or more gang homicides during the year.
Table 1. Percentage of Law Enforcement Agencies
Reporting Gang Problems, 2002–2006
Gang Problems Gang Problems
Reported in Ever Reported,
2006 (%) 2002–2006 (%)
Rural Counties 14.9 27.4
Smaller Cities 32.6 48.3
Suburban Counties 51.0 61.5
Larger Cities 86.4 90.5
Overall Estimate in
Study Population 33.3 47.3
Figure 1 shows the percentage of gang-problem agencies report ing that incidences of the specified gang crime had “increased” in the respondent’s jurisdictions in 2006 compared with 2004 and 2005. For two offenses, aggravated assault and drug sales, more than half of the agencies reported an increase in 2006. These two offenses were followed, in descending order, by robbery, larceny/theft, burglary, and auto theft. The 2006 NYGS requested each respondent to indicate the fac
tor(s) that influenced gang-related violence in the respondent’s jurisdiction. More than half of the law enforcement agencies
reported that intergang conflict (between-gang conflict) and drug-related factors directly affected levels of gang-related violence in their jurisdictions in 2006. Somewhat frequently reported (25–50 percent of the agencies) were the following three
factors: gang-member migration across U.S. jurisdictions, emergence of new gangs, and the return of gang members from secure confinement. Infrequently reported (less than one-quarter of the agencies) were factors associated with intragang conflict (within gang conflict) and gang-member migration from outside the United States.
Office of Justice Programs Innovation • Partnerships • Safer Neighborhoods: Go to www.ojp.usdoj.gov
Aggravated Auto Burglary Drug Larceny/ Robbery
Assault Theft Sales Theft
OJJDP’s Gang Prevention Activities
The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention:
(OJJDP) supports several initiatives to prevent and reduce gang activity. OJJDP’s Gang Reduction Program is designed to
reduce gang activity in targeted neighborhoods by incorporating a broad spectrum of research-based interventions to address the range of personal, family, and community factors that contribute to juvenile delinquency and gang activity. The program integrates local, State, and Federal resources to incorporate state-of-the-art practices in prevention, intervention, and suppression. In April 2007, Los Angeles announced the launch of a $168 million anti-
gang initiative model based on the Gang Reduction Program.
Other OJJDP gang prevention activities include:
◆ Gang-Free Schools and Communities Program seeks
to reduce youth gang crime and violence in schools and
communities.
◆ National Youth Gang Center, funded by OJJDP, conducts
assessments of the scope and characteristics of youth gang
activity in the United States, develops resources and makes
them available to the field, and provides training and technical
assistance in support of community-based prevention,
intervention, and suppression efforts.
◆ Gang Prevention Coordination Assistance Program
provides funding to enhance coordination of local, State,
and Federal resources in support of community partnerships
implementing two or more of the following anti-gang strate
gies: primary prevention, secondary prevention, gang interven
tion, and gang enforcement.
The latest gang-related resources may be found on OJJDP’s Web site (http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ojjdp) by searching using the
keyword “gang.” You can also visit that website for more information about the complete National Youth Gang Survey 2006, published August 1, 2008.
Office of Justice Programs
Editor's Note: The Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency and Prevention (OJJDP) published, on August 1, 2008, a comprehensive National Youth Gang Survey and a Fact Sheet, below, which serves as a highly condensed brief. For additional information about youth gangs, call OJJDP’s Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse at 800–851–3420, or contact NYGC at 800–446–0912 or http://www.iir.com/nygc/. Arlen Egley, Jr., Ph.D., is a Senior Research Associate and Christina E. O’Donnell, M.S., is a Research Associate with NYGC, which is operated for OJJDP by the Institute for Intergovernmental Research in Tallahassee, FL. The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention is a compo nent of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Assistance; the Bureau of Justice Statistics; the Community Capacity Development Office; the National Institute of Justice; the Office for Victims of Crime; and the Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking (SMART).
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
J. Robert Flores, Administrator July 2008 #05
Highlights of the
2006 National Youth Gang Survey
by Arlen Egley, Jr., and Christina E. O’Donnell
Annually since 1995, the National Youth Gang Center (NYGC) has conducted the National Youth Gang Survey (NYGS) of law
enforcement agencies across the United States regarding the pres ence and characteristics of local gang problems. This Fact Sheet summarizes NYGS findings from the 2006 survey. The current nationally representative sample was selected in 2002 and
includes the following agencies:
◆ All police departments that serve cities with populations of
50,000 or more (n=624) (larger cities).
◆ All suburban county police and sheriffs’ departments (n=740)
(suburban counties).
◆ A randomly selected sample of police departments that serve
cities with populations between 2,500 and 49,999 (n=695)
(smaller cities).
◆ A randomly selected sample of rural county police and
sheriffs’ departments (n=492) (rural counties).
NYGC asked survey recipients to report information solely for
youth gangs, defined as “a group of youths or young adults in
your jurisdiction that you or other responsible persons in your
agency or community are willing to identify as a ‘gang.’”
Motorcycle gangs, hate or ideology groups, prison gangs, and
exclusively adult gangs were excluded from the survey.
Survey Findings
Of the 2,551 survey recipients, 2,199 (86 percent) responded to the 2006 survey. Table 1 shows the percentage of agencies that reported gang problems by area type. Overall, it is estimated that 3,400 jurisdictions served by city (population of 2,500 or more) and county law enforcement agencies experienced gang problems in 2006. Based on survey results, it is estimated that approximately 785,000 gang members and 26,500 gangs were active in the United States in 2006. Readily available and reliable gang-crime data are difficult to obtain on a national level. Previous NYGC surveys reveal that agencies with gang problems often do not regularly record local offenses, with the exception of homicides, as “gang-related.” With these data limitations in mind, the 2006 NYGS requested each respondent to provide both specific gang-homicide data (i.e., number of homicides involving a gang member as either the perpetrator and/or the victim) and general trends (i.e., increasing, decreasing) for other serious gang-related crimes in the respondent’s jurisdiction. Among agencies reporting gang problems in smaller cities and rural counties, a large majority (89 and 86 percent respectively) recorded zero gang-related homicides in 2006. By comparison, most cities with populations over 100,000 experienced one or more gang homicides during the year.
Table 1. Percentage of Law Enforcement Agencies
Reporting Gang Problems, 2002–2006
Gang Problems Gang Problems
Reported in Ever Reported,
2006 (%) 2002–2006 (%)
Rural Counties 14.9 27.4
Smaller Cities 32.6 48.3
Suburban Counties 51.0 61.5
Larger Cities 86.4 90.5
Overall Estimate in
Study Population 33.3 47.3
Figure 1 shows the percentage of gang-problem agencies report ing that incidences of the specified gang crime had “increased” in the respondent’s jurisdictions in 2006 compared with 2004 and 2005. For two offenses, aggravated assault and drug sales, more than half of the agencies reported an increase in 2006. These two offenses were followed, in descending order, by robbery, larceny/theft, burglary, and auto theft. The 2006 NYGS requested each respondent to indicate the fac
tor(s) that influenced gang-related violence in the respondent’s jurisdiction. More than half of the law enforcement agencies
reported that intergang conflict (between-gang conflict) and drug-related factors directly affected levels of gang-related violence in their jurisdictions in 2006. Somewhat frequently reported (25–50 percent of the agencies) were the following three
factors: gang-member migration across U.S. jurisdictions, emergence of new gangs, and the return of gang members from secure confinement. Infrequently reported (less than one-quarter of the agencies) were factors associated with intragang conflict (within gang conflict) and gang-member migration from outside the United States.
Office of Justice Programs Innovation • Partnerships • Safer Neighborhoods: Go to www.ojp.usdoj.gov
Aggravated Auto Burglary Drug Larceny/ Robbery
Assault Theft Sales Theft
OJJDP’s Gang Prevention Activities
The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention:
(OJJDP) supports several initiatives to prevent and reduce gang activity. OJJDP’s Gang Reduction Program is designed to
reduce gang activity in targeted neighborhoods by incorporating a broad spectrum of research-based interventions to address the range of personal, family, and community factors that contribute to juvenile delinquency and gang activity. The program integrates local, State, and Federal resources to incorporate state-of-the-art practices in prevention, intervention, and suppression. In April 2007, Los Angeles announced the launch of a $168 million anti-
gang initiative model based on the Gang Reduction Program.
Other OJJDP gang prevention activities include:
◆ Gang-Free Schools and Communities Program seeks
to reduce youth gang crime and violence in schools and
communities.
◆ National Youth Gang Center, funded by OJJDP, conducts
assessments of the scope and characteristics of youth gang
activity in the United States, develops resources and makes
them available to the field, and provides training and technical
assistance in support of community-based prevention,
intervention, and suppression efforts.
◆ Gang Prevention Coordination Assistance Program
provides funding to enhance coordination of local, State,
and Federal resources in support of community partnerships
implementing two or more of the following anti-gang strate
gies: primary prevention, secondary prevention, gang interven
tion, and gang enforcement.
The latest gang-related resources may be found on OJJDP’s Web site (http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ojjdp) by searching using the
keyword “gang.” You can also visit that website for more information about the complete National Youth Gang Survey 2006, published August 1, 2008.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)